ʱ : 2017年上海普陀区高三英语一模试?- 百度文库ϿʼĶ
Renovation: resort will
close for May Free canoeing Free talks in the Oldest living rain forest Free evening Free minibus trip Comments
bikes and tennis courts; Free open-air tennis courts around island horse-riding extra
Horse-riding (optional extra)
Plane flights to Wilson Island only $50 Transport
1/2 hour by minibus 10 mins by taxi 15m Bus three
to/from Self-drive auto 1h
times/week approx.2 hours
airport
*Priceper person, per package, twin share
Children 11 years and under are 50%. Children 4 years and
under are free.
60. Which holiday location doesn't welcome young children?A.Mountain Lodge. B. Pelican Resort.
C. Cedar Lodge. D. None of the above.
61. According to the holiday advertisement, which of the following is NOT TRUE?
A.Both Mountain Lodge and Pelican Resort are close to the
coast.
B.Tourists can't visit Pelican Resort in May because of the
restoration.
C.All meals are included if tourists choose to go to the Pelican
Resort.
D.Canoeing and cycling are provided at no extra cost at Cedar
Lodge.
62.A holiday in Mountain Lodge for a couple with 12-year-old twin girls and a 3-year-old boy costs
A.$825 B. $990 C. $1320 D. $1650
7
(C)
France, which prides itself as the global innovator of fashion,
has decided its fashion industry
has lost an absolute right to define physical beauty for woman. Its lawmakers gave preliminary
approval last week to a law that would make it a crime to employ ultra-thin models on
catwalks. The parliament also agreed to ban websites that advocate excessive thinnessby promoting extreme dieting.
be suggest beauty should not measures have a couple of uplifting motives. They Such -thin
health. That's a start. And the ban on ultradefined by looks that end up with impinging onmodels seems to go beyond protecting models from starving themselves to health, as some have
done. It tells the fashion industry that it must take responsibility for the signal it sends to women,
individual determine their the social standard they must use to especially teenage girls, about worth.
The bans, if fully enforced, would suggest to woman (and
many men) that they should not let
others be judges of their beauty. And perhaps faintly, they hint that people should look to other
Ʒ(qualities like character and intellect rather than dieting their way to size zero or wasp-waist ).
The French measures, however, rely too much on severe punishment to change a culture that
still regards beauty as skin-deep and bone-showing. Under the law, using a fashion model that does
not meet a government-defined index of body mess could result in a $85,000 fine and six months in prison.
The fashion industry knows it has an inherent problem in
focusing on material decoration and
idealized body types. In Denmark, the United States, and a few other countries, it is trying to set
voluntary standard for models and fashion images that rely more on peer pressure for enforcement.
In contrast to France's actions, Denmark's fashion industry agreed last month on rules and
punishments regarding age, health, and other characteristics of models. The newly revised Danish
Fashion Ethical Charter (dearly states: We are aware of and take responsibility for
the impact the fashion industry has on body ideals, especially on young people.^
Relying on ethical persuasion rather than law to address the